Once a journalist, always a journalist

I promised my fiancé that I would not do any reporting during our vacation in France. After three years of supporting me through a master’s degree and jobs in Toronto and Qatar, I think he earned the right to put his foot down. But that didn’t stop us from participating in some journalism-esque activities.

We bought a GoPro camera and filmed everything from drives around the French countryside and village visits to go-kart racing, ice bucket challenges and a ropes/zipline course called Acro Lugny.

It wasn’t your average trip to France, but we had a blast! I even got to play around with the footage using iMovie when I got home. Check out what we got up to on our Burgundy adventure. 

(Music: Le fabuleux destin d’Amélie Poulain by Yann Tiersen) 

The Khmer Rouge regime lives on in refugee families

For my master’s thesis I looked at how trauma caused by the Khmer Rouge regime affects Cambodian Canadian refugee families today. Below are a few short audio excerpts from some of my interviews.

If you want to read more on this topic, please download a free copy of one of my stories, “Families of Strangers”, published in the October 2013 issue of Al Jazeera Magazine. You can also check out a second feature that I self-published on this website.

Through their eyes: One woman regains the past she saw but can’t remember

Samnang Eam sits at an old, white kitchen table wearing a black, button-up dress. Her thick, black curls tumble towards the seat of her chair and camouflage into the fabric of her outfit. Bangs sweep over her left eye and partly conceal it from view. But they can’t hide the tears that flow down her face and occasionally drop to the table’s shiny surface. Eam looks away when she speaks as if entranced in a memory that carries her somewhere outside the tiny, windowless meeting room. The confident woman who greeted me only minutes earlier on her front porch in Ottawa, waving a hand of sparkling pink fingernails, is suddenly struggling to get her words out. Her mind seems to wander through Cambodia’s jungle and through family conversations as she reveals the details of how her four siblings died. The year was 1979, the Vietnamese had liberated Cambodia from the Khmer Rouge and many families jumped at the chance to flee the country. Eam was born in the jungle somewhere between Cambodia and Thailand. Her memories of the escape, like those of second generation Cambodian-Canadians, belong to her parents. They were given to her five years ago when she was 29.

Classrooms converted to interrogation rooms at S21

Classrooms converted into interrogation rooms at S21

A wave of hot, musty air overwhelms my lungs as I enter each building of the Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum in the capital city of Phnom Penh. I sweat and picture what life must have been like for the people who died here – in crumbling, converted classrooms with stained white and red chequered floors. Display boards leave little to the imagination. Wide-eyed portraits stare down barbwire-covered hallways wearing expressions of horror. Torture devices, bones, paintings and documents listing rules, line the walls of the regime’s most notorious, and at the time secret, interrogation camp – then called Security Prison 21. Yet as a tourist far-removed from such violence, I struggle to believe it actually happened. I’m not alone. Even survivors of the Khmer Rouge regime have a hard time convincing their children that Cambodians tortured, executed and starved other Cambodians for four years and ultimately killed 1.7 million people. Some families avoid discussing the subject entirely.

Over 13,000 Cambodians came to Canada as refugees in the decade after the Khmer Rouge fell. Eam spent the first five years of her life in a Thai refugee camp before moving to Ottawa to live, as she would say, like a normal Canadian kid. But Eam’s birth and family history are far from relatable to the average Canadian-raised child. Cambodia’s story is understood through pictures taken from the perspective of the Khmer Rouge. Mangled bodies, living skeletons, torture devices, movies like the Killing Fields and haunting images of prisons are well known. News articles and broadcasts repeat the statistic that 1.7 million people starved, were executed or died from exhaustion induced by forced labour. But not all Cambodians perished during the four years between 1975 and 1979 during which the Khmer Rouge turned the country into a nation of slaves. This is the story of one family’s escape to Canada, the history that followed them and a young woman’s struggle to understand her parents’ memories after growing up Canadian.

Generational divide

Eam used to wonder if she was adopted. She laughs and calls herself the “rebel” child of the family. “I’m so different from them,” she said. When I first met Eam on her porch, it was January and the snow banks towered above her head. She later tells me her height and explains how being small never stops her from doing anything. “I’m 4’10 and three quarters at most,” said Eam. “I’m very loud. So when I want something done, I’m gonna get it done.” She is president of the Cambodian Association of the Ottawa Valley, a trained police officer, a part-time spa manager, a mother and a volunteer with countless organizations. At 33, she bursts with energy and confidence. Eam now sees her parents in herself. As a child, this wasn’t so easy. Growing up as a refugee in Canada, Eam felt she had no proof of where she came from. There were no pictures of her pregnant mother or smiling images of her parents holding a new baby. There were no baby pictures at all. “People are so lucky. They don’t realize that having a baby photo of you – it’s something like a gift,” said Eam. Her parents tried to make up for the lack of images with words. Eam now confesses that, as a teenager, she didn’t want to hear their stories.

I phoned Eam after our initial meeting to learn more about what she was like as a teenager. She explained that her younger self was hard to get along with. “I smoked cigarettes at 12,” she said. Eam would lie to her parents and sneak out of the house to go to parties. Her mom spent hours driving around looking for her and would often call the police and local community centre workers to help with the search. Then, one night, Eam came home to find her mother crying in the hallway. She paused on the phone and her tone revealed a strong sense of regret for her past actions. “I hugged her and I swore I would never do it again…and I never did,” she said. Eam’s knowledge of what her parents went through helps her put a lot of their behaviour in perspective. Back then, she didn’t understand that their need to protect her stemmed from memories of losing four of their children.

Bonds of trauma

To escape the burbling of a fish tank, Eam leads me down a winding staircase to the basement of the family home. She jokes about killing her mother’s fish in the past and is too worried to unplug the tank in case something should happen to them. Eam’s parents are now retired and spend six months of the year in Cambodia with the family they left behind when they came to Canada as refugees. Eam lives with her mother and father because she isn’t married and the family prefers to support each other. She is still adjusting to them being away for so many months. We walk through a meticulously organized storage area into a meeting room with a white kitchen table and chairs. Green-grey walls and laminate floors make the room feel like a secret space hidden in the back of an otherwise unfinished basement. Tufts of pink insulation tucked under sheets of clear plastic lay between exposed floor beams. Only the ceiling remains unfinished. A whiteboard hangs on the wall with the phrase “everybody talks” written in black felt marker on pastel squares of paper. It is Eam’s motto and one she enforces during Cambodian association meetings. At first we sat in a silence unfamiliar to a room often filled with the voices of Ottawa’s Cambodian community leaders. Eam placed a glass of water and a black notebook on the table. “There is no set path. Just follow your heart,” was printed in shades of fluorescent pink on the cover.

I ask Eam what life was like for her parents’ under the Khmer Rouge. Her mom worked at a nursing station and her father was a teacher, but they pretended to be uneducated when the Khmer Rouge came to power. Educated people were dubbed threats to a regime that sought to build a nation of peasants. Eam said Khmer Rouge soldiers forced her family out of their home on April 17, 1979. But the Khmer Rouge took over the country on April 17, 1975, four years earlier. The Vietnamese liberated or, by some accounts, invaded Phnom Penh on January 7, 1979. Eam’s dates don’t match the history. We stumble through several questions before moving on without definite answers. When I phoned Eam back to clarify, she sounded unsure and admitted not knowing all the details. “I wish my dad was here,” she said with a sigh. But this story isn’t about facts. It’s about the confusion and emotions brought on by traumatic memories and how families deal with those memories. Eam could only tell me what her parents told her. She might not know where her family lived in Cambodia or when they were forced to leave, but she does know that her parents experienced loss as they tried to get their children to Thailand. I let Eam share her family’s version of their escape.

Knowing hurts

Landmines made every step a life or death decision. “They started off with a bunch of different families and one by one lost many,” she said in a disconnected voice as if talking about people she doesn’t personally know. Cambodia is one of the most heavily mined countries in the world along with Egypt, Iran, Angola, Afghanistan and Iraq. Eam tells the story in snapshots. She does not know enough about how the pieces fit together to develop a continuous narrative. Her parents, Sam An Eam and Kim Ting, ran with their three sons and two daughters, all under the age of 13, through Cambodia’s dense jungle. Eam opened her black notebook to reveal a stick figure drawing of a man carrying two circles sketched in black ballpoint pen. She explained that the circles represent two small children. Above the drawing the following list appeared:

Yong    12

Bro      10

Bro      8

Sister   6         

Sister   4

Eam never refers to her deceased siblings by their names at any point in our conversation. That could be because she only found out about them less than five years ago. “I really actually believed, in my mind, maybe I didn’t listen properly when I was younger, I thought, two kids.” She has never seen a picture of her brothers and sisters. But they are more than nameless, faceless children. Eam explains how her parents struggled up and down mountains and across rivers. Soldiers captured them several times and forced them back into Cambodia. Only when we started talking about the children, though, did Eam choke on her words and look away. She paused and apologized for crying. She told the rest of the story in tears, partly composing herself between descriptions of each child’s death, only to unravel again when she started talking about the next child.

The two little girls died first. Eam’s oldest brother, Yong, the only child to survive, helped his father bury their bodies. He was 12-years-old. Her mother couldn’t watch. The need to keep running meant leaving their daughters’ bodies in the jungle. Starvation and dehydration threatened them as often as landmines. When Eam’s father found a root that looked edible, he dug it up and offered it to his sons. The eight-year-old refused to eat claiming he knew he was dying. Tears stream down Eam’s face and she carefully wipes them away with a tissue, trying not to smear her makeup. “I guess for an eight-year-old to tell you that…to look at your face, I can’t imagine like what that would do to someone,” said Eam. “I can’t imagine…what my parents had to go through.” He died that same night. Eam struggles to control her sobbing as she tells me her second oldest brother was the last to die. The ten-year-old held his father’s hand and begged for them to leave him in the jungle. Eam’s father stayed up all night cradling his son. “[T]hey didn’t want to leave him. He held him all night and he died,” she said.

But amidst the death and suffering, Eam, a newborn, survived. Her mother gave birth to her in the rainy jungle with no doctors and no running water on May 7, 1979 at seven in the morning. She claimed her parents were trying to survive by drinking each other’s urine. Eam’s mother was so severely dehydrated and malnourished that she couldn’t feed her daughter. “[M]y mother wasn’t even lactating, so I wasn’t being able to be fed,” she said. The emphasis in Eam’s voice revealed the shock she feels about her own survival. Her parents named her “Samnang,” which means “lucky” or “good fortune” in Khmer. She was one of the few children to survive.

According to Eam, it took months for her family to reach a transit camp in Thailand. It was a chaotic and crowded place. Trucks kept dropping more and more people off. Eam’s parents fixated on the vehicles thinking their children – the four they buried in the jungle – would eventually step off one. “They just th[ought] that maybe they didn’t die and maybe all their kids are […] just going to get off those trucks and be like all the other Cambodians that did survive,” said Eam. Several months on the run with almost no food and water had taken its toll on her parents. A Thai couple offered to help baby Samnang. The painful thought of losing a fifth child forced them to give her away. They prepared to leave for the more permanent refugee camp with their one surviving son. But, at the last minute, Eam’s mother went to find her daughter in the sea of people. Eam told me her parents said she never cried during the escape from Cambodia. Yet she laughed and said it was her screaming that eventually reunited the family. The Thai couple couldn’t get Eam to stop crying and wanted to give her back. But their reunion was really a matter of luck. “[I]t was minutes, literally minutes, before I would have, I guess, had a different life,” she said. Eam admits feeling upset that her parents gave her away. “I was like, ‘you gave me away? I can’t believe you gave me away!’ Not realizing they didn’t want to give me away.”

I ask what it’s like to know these details about her siblings’ deaths, but not have any of her own memories about her family’s traumatic past. Eam wishes she could share some of her parents’ pain or take some of the burden from them. Her emotions and sadness come from thinking about how much her parents suffered and still suffer over the loss of their children. “I feel so bad for them to actually have to go through that,” she said. “Mine was just a memory told by someone else.” She feels guilty for being a “bratty” teenager and for making her parents worry by sneaking out of the house. Eam waited so long to ask her parents because she was scared and didn’t want to know. She heard snippets of information growing up and admits not wanting to confirm that her family and other Cambodians saw and experienced horrible things. “I didn’t want to be saddened by it,” she said. “But that was just kinda selfish of me. Not in a bad way, I don’t think, I just think I wasn’t ready.”

When Eam finally got to hear her parents tell their story, she couldn’t stop crying. “We can only imagine what that’s like, but we don’t know…until you look into someone’s eyes and you have to watch them tell you that story about losing their kids,” she said. The conversation started one night before Eam was supposed to go out with two girlfriends. Her mother, father and oldest brother sat on and around puffy burgundy and black leather couches in the upstairs living room. When Eam’s girlfriends arrived, they cancelled their planned night out to listen to her family’s story. Eam took notes to help her remember and understand everything. She said she is proud of where she comes from and is thankful for the sacrifices her parents made to bring her to Canada. She wants other Cambodian-Canadians to feel the same way.

The past is a secret

But unlike Eam’s family, many Cambodians do not talk about the regime. And parents don’t always share their stories and experiences with their Canadian-born or raised children. Eam knows firsthand that discussing the Khmer Rouge forces people to mentally return to a time they wish they could forget. She watched her parents cry and unravel their pain in front of her. “It’s a place where they don’t wanna go,” she said. “They know it happened, but I guess remembering and talking about it again, I feel like it’s opening the doors for more hurt.” Yet she thinks it is important for people to discuss their memories and know that others will support them when they need help. Janet Prak would agree. Recently elected to the position of vice president of the association, she will take on her role in May. Prak is 29. She got involved in the community at the age of five by participating in traditional Cambodian court dancing. Like Eam, her parents were open with her about their lives under the Khmer Rouge. But, as a child, she felt confused by their behaviour and her heritage. The process of learning her family’s history made Prak realize that other Cambodian-Canadian children might benefit from hearing her story. She wants to ensure that the past is not lost among younger generations and sees the association as a way to create awareness.

As a child, Prak remembers finding her mother sitting alone in the dark all the time. She thought her mom was angry with her and never understood why. Then, one day when she was 13 or 14, Prak decided to do something. “I said, ‘mom, you know, stop sitting in the dark. You need to come out. You need to tell me what is on your mind.’ And she said, ‘Janet, look over there. Do you see your grandfather?’ I said, ‘no mom, what are you talking about?’” Prak’s mother believed she was sitting alone in a dark room with family members who had been killed by the Khmer Rouge. She admitted to her young, Canadian-born daughter that she felt responsible for the death of her father, first husband and youngest brother. She watched Khmer Rouge guerrillas execute all three of them and was playing the scene over and over again in the darkness of her Ottawa home. Prak worried about her mother and wanted to give her a way to share her pain. “She started to walk me through the whole story,” said Prak. “So this was an after school thing.” Starting in grade 10, Prak would come home, listen to her mother, cry and record their conversations in a diary. “That was sort of a way for me to bond with my mom to kind of get her to be in sort of a healthier state of mind,” she said. At the time, Prak didn’t know what she wanted to do with her mother’s story; she just knew she had to do something with it.

A new kind of leader

Eam spent a lot of time with other Cambodians when she was growing up in Ottawa. Her father sat on the association’s board for several years and had her volunteering from a young age. The family often takes in new Cambodian-Canadians and gives them a place to stay until they find jobs. Until two years ago, Eam didn’t think she would ever undertake a leadership role like her father. But when she went to cast a vote at the association’s annual meeting, her opinion changed. Eam was on her way to a picnic and was wearing a sundress and flip-flops. She had her daughter and niece with her. “Little did I know the community had put my name in the ballot…and I won,” she said. Eam remembers feeling unprepared to accept the position, but decided to embrace the role of president anyways. It was what the community wanted. Prak has known Eam for 15 to 16 years. She understands why people chose Eam to be president. “She’s an amazing person. She’s very kind-hearted. Very giving,” said Prak. Prak believes Eam’s age places her in a better position to connect with Cambodian-Canadian youth. “She doesn’t push people to participate,” said Prak. “She’s like your friend and she gives you that choice.”

In 2010, the association threw a party to celebrate the 30th anniversary of the first wave of Cambodian immigrants to Canada. Eam looks back on this event with pride because it brought so many members of the community together to celebrate their lives in Canada. The room bustled with hundreds of people. Cambodian families, sponsor families and Members of Parliament joined together to share food, entertainment and the history of two countries. Old photos hung, accompanied by sponsorship information, in a corner of the room. Women and men performed traditional Cambodian dances wearing costumes accented in gold. A constant hum of excitement from the audience, at times, threatened to overtake speakers at the podium as they read out letters from Stephen Harper and Jack Layton. Everyone danced to live music under flashing lights. Singers wore gold and red sparkling outfits as they took turns revealing the delicate, fluctuating sounds of Khmer.

But one act stood out among the dance performances and speeches. A small, young woman stood on stage in bare feet, wearing a black dress and a turquoise-green coloured scarf. She recited a poem that she had written about the Khmer Rouge regime and dedicated it to all the parents who survived. That woman was Janet Prak. She wrote the poem using her diary and years of conversations she had with her mother. It was six minutes long and recited in both English and Khmer. Parts of it were general and others specifically about her mother.

Morning, my mother would work: on her back a pair of blackened clothing, blackened with mud, blackened with communism.

At noon she would eat nothing short of a few scoops of rice and boiled weeds with just some salt.

At night, she would lay inside her hut, ear and face planted on the ground searching for sounds of horses like “Click, Clack, Click, Clack” she would listen. “Are they coming for me she thought?”

Pressed, her hands together she would pray, “let me live another day so I can keep working the rice fields,” and when the horses stopped a few huts down – a sound of ruffling, and the Khmer Rouge whispered: “Do as we say or you will see.”

Prak spoke her poem with serious intensity to the sound of a bow and string instrument called a trow. The music, combined with the audience’s chatter, left Prak battling for her words to be heard. As I watched the YouTube video, I wondered how people in the room felt. Eam described that night as an experience of contrasting emotions. “It was a bittersweet moment because you’re remembering things that happened, but you’re also embracing the new things that are happening,” she said.

When I spoke with Prak, she admitted several older members of the board contested her poem. They wanted the party to be more about happiness and celebrating than about remembering the horrors of the past. They told her, “we don’t want to make everybody feel depressed.” But Prak thought ignoring the past would do a disservice to younger generations of Cambodians. “If we were to take this very important piece of information, hide it under the carpet, I don’t think that’s fair and that’s realistic in terms of what really happened,” she said. “I really was fighting against, you know, the older generation, what they thought.” Prak decided to recite the poem despite opposition. She angrily explained her reasoning. “Whether or not they disagree and they think that this is too sad a poem to share with everyone, I’m going to do it anyway because, um, I’m tired of it,” she said. Prak is tired of the older generations’ belief that the Khmer Rouge regime has little to no impact on Cambodian children born and raised in Canada.

The faces of S21's prisoners on display at the prison turned museum

The faces of S21’s prisoners are on display at the prison turned museum

Prak told me that almost none of her friends’ parents share details with them as her mother does with her. She said silence damages more than those who survived the regime. Unanswered questions leave Canadian-raised children confused about who they and their parents are. Prak describes her mother’s stories as the missing pieces of her identity. Both Eam and Prak view the association as a way to help younger Cambodians connect with their heritage and with people from older generations. “I see the community as one big family,” said Eam. Both are also willing to share their personal stories with others to help Cambodian-Canadians understand the past. “Knowing your roots is very important,” said Eam. This is an attitude she will carry into her second two-year term as president.

At Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum, photographs lay still beneath panes of glass. Faces of men, women and children wear one expression: fear. Eam hasn’t visited the rooms of the prison turned museum. She hasn’t inhaled the thick, hot air. She has not been to Cambodia since her birth. Eam knows and believes the horrors of the regime because of her parents’ stories. But many pictures remain trapped in the memories of those who saw the acts of violence firsthand. Eam and Prak are part of a generation raised in a different culture – one that shares knowledge and prioritizes openness. Both women became visitors in their parents’ unique memories and stories. Encouraging other Cambodian-Canadians in Ottawa to do the same has been a slow process. Yet Eam feels that conversations are important to help people overcome the trauma that is rarely discussed. “With the community being able to talk a bit more, I think we’re only going to get better,” she said.

Science to one day shoot gun policy in the foot

I have lived in Toronto for around two months now. Since my arrival in May, gun violence has dominated the headlines and sent the city, province and country into a flurry of discussions over potential solutions.

The aftermath of the Danzig Street shooting (Image courtesy of the National Post).

First, in June, there was the Eaton Centre shooting that left two dead and seven others injured after someone opened fire in the mall’s crowded food court. Then, at the beginning of July, a Scarborough street party erupted into a shootout that killed two people and injured 23 others.

And these are just the high-profile stories.

Some blame gangs and drug dealers. Others single out policy and policing strategies.And then there are those who have started calling this summer the “Summer of the Gun 2.” Summer 2005 earned the name “Summer of the Gun” when 24 people where shot and killed between June and September.

Regardless of the cause, violence and guns will probably always be a problem in large cities like Toronto.

Looking ahead

As a researcher for Discovery Channel, I learn a lot about technological and scientific advancements that are changing the way people live – some for better and others for worse.

I’ve read about things I never fathomed were possible. The manufacturing of guns with 3D printers is one of those things.

The harmless 3D printer can print guns (Image Courtesy of the Car Connection).

Policy makers beware. If you think gun violence is rampantly out of control now, what will it be like if people can easily print their own weapons? Forget worrying about gun enthusiasts hopping the US border to purchase guns at the nearest Walmart. Instead, pay more attention to the backyard, basement, attic gun-lovers who will create their own guns on once-harmless printers.

“‘HaveBlue,’ a member of the AR15.com gun enthusiast forum, which is named after a common semi-automatic rifle, claims to have carried out the first successful test-firing of a 3D-printed gun,” according to an article in the New Scientist.

HaveBlue said they printed a receiver, combined it with an existing pistol and fired more than 200 rounds. So, even if law-makers banned guns entirely, someone would find a way to keep making them.

Recycling old solutions

I’m not trying to create a scary, dystopian view of the future. Rather, I came across this technology in my research and thought it added an interesting dimension to the gun violence conversation.

We already know people can easily find ways to purchase firearms. We also know that a common response to escalating gun violence is either increased policing or changes to existing laws. Toronto has chosen to deploy hundreds of extra police officers during the month of August in an attempt to curb further acts of violence.

But while more police could help in the short-term, perhaps we should also look to other solutions. Science and technology could help to form solid, long-term policies now. The best thing law-makers can do is to stay ahead of what could be possible five years from today – things like printing guns.

Publishing part of the story

Journalists hold a lot of power to sway opinion, regardless of whether or not they get the story right or wrong. The more controversial the issue, the more news outlets will cover it. We have the ability to tell people what to think and, frankly, that can be dangerous.

Working as a researcher for Discovery Channel Canada has opened my eyes to the melting pot that can be science journalism. I call it the melting pot because it seems headline writers and journalists sometimes grab data from scientific studies and let the numbers do the talking.

Context often takes a back seat to flashy percentages and statistics that look very convincing without the flab of words like “approximately” or “estimated.” Throw all the stories from various news outlets together and issues take on whole new meanings.

Finding facts behind jargon

Most journalists are not scientists and scientific research papers are written in an entirely different language. I discovered the complexity of understanding science writing when I was asked to draft a segment on “gaydar” (aka whether or not people have built-in radars to help detect sexual preferences).

I started reading some pretty interesting sentences. For example, “In a previous positron emission tomography study, we found that smelling AND and EST activated regions covering sexually dimorphic nuclei of the anterior hypothalamus,” said researchers of a study on how humans react to pheromones.

Toronto pride week at Kensington Market.

Never have I felt so glued to an online dictionary. So, can we really blame the journalist when he or she gets it wrong or spins a number into a bigger issue than it is? I think the answer to this question is yes.

Every story should be written assuming the audience will only read that one story. Ask yourself, “if a reader skims my story and doesn’t seek out further information on the topic, will he or she take away an accurate understanding of  the issue?” If the answer is no, you run the risk of spreading inaccurate information.

I constantly asked myself this question as I wrote the segment on gaydar. The last thing I wanted to do was reinforce stereotypes or blow something out of proportion without evidence. But understanding scientific studies without a science background can be an arduous process.

The scientists never said that

I’m sure there are countless examples of news stories where the angle overshoots truth and lands somewhere between fiction and reality, but I will just give you one example to think about.

Psychologists at the University of Washington recently conducted a study that involved flashing images of faces in front of research participants. The goal was to examine how people decide if a person is gay or straight. Results showed that people could determine sexual preferences with “above chance accuracy.”

Researchers concluded that the way a person’s face is viewed (upside-down or right-side up) plays a role in judging sexuality.

“The present research is the first to demonstrate (a) that configural face processing significantly contributes to perception of sexual orientation, and (b) that sexual orientation is inferred more easily from women’s vs. men’s faces,” said psychologists at the University of Washington.

Researchers concluded that their findings provided reason for further testing outside the lab. Despite this call for additional research, headlines still claimed that the study proved, without a doubt, that “gaydar” exists.

Headlines like, “‘Gaydar’ exist: we can tell who is gay or straight in the blink of an eye,” “Gaydar exists, US study shows” and “You’re more likely to spot a gay woman than a man – and most of us can work out someone’s sexuality in seconds” spammed the Internet.

Buzz-killing context  

Now for the missing flab. The faces had no hair, ears, or jewellery. They were just pictures doctored to exclude cues that could sway participants into deciding if a person is gay or straight.

In a real world setting, people would have hairstyles and piercings that could affect one person’s judgment of another person’s sexuality. So the study does not prove that gaydar exists. Instead it provides grounds for further studies.

The challenge for journalists, then, is to make information accessible and keep it accurate at the same time. But breaking down complicated issues in a way that is understandable to the average person, when you are an average person, can be a struggle.

If there’s one thing I can take away from this experience, it’s that if you don’t understand the jargon, clarity is always a phone call away. Instead of drowning in a sea of confusion, call up an expert. Most people working under the science umbrella are highly enthusiastic. And, they would rather help you understand something than see you get it wrong.

The unpaid internship pays in passion

The “unpaid internship” debate is getting a lot of media attention lately. And, since I am currently in an “unpaid internship” situation, I thought I would weigh into the growing argument.

It’s undeniably hard to be a full-time graduate student. Bills pile up, expenses grow and then there’s that pesky thing called tuition. And while the bills grow, the time you have to work a part-time job shrinks along with your savings account. If you’re lucky, you might get a scholarship or beg a loan out of your parents. But these are hard to come by. So most of us resign to seeing the big, flashing “DEBT” sign every time we swipe our credit and debit cards.

And then, around April, it hits you. You have to work for free all summer. Really? It seems like a one-way trip to the poor house. You can’t help but think all is lost and hyperventilation becomes a regular occurrence.

Okay, so I’m exaggerating. Sometimes, though, it can feel like all is lost.

Why didn’t I know this before?

I discovered my passion while working at Discovery.

When I started journalism school, I naively thought all internships were paid. I was wrong. But herein lies an important lesson and one that applies to selecting an internship too. Always do your research.

Investigating the media organizations you want to work for is important. Sometimes this involves abandoning your utopian view of the newspaper, magazine or channel you love. Remember, being a consumer is not the same as being an intern.

Diana Wang and her experience at Harper’s Bazaar is the most publicized example of the unpaid internship gone wrong. In an interview with the CBC’s Anna Maria Tremonti, Wang describes her disappointment and heartbreak as she watched the internship of her dreams spiral into an abuse of power. She has launched a lawsuit against the owner of Harper’s Bazaar.

But does the unpaid internship always have to end in turmoil? From my experience the answer to this question is no.

Working hard to work for free

I applied for at least ten internships and started my applications during the second week of school. Competition for unpaid internships in Canada is fierce. Competition for paid internships is even worse.

News organizations are busy. You will spend hours writing cover letters and preparing applications. You will even pay to express ship your clippings. And, most times, you will never hear back.

You will be angry. You will cry. You will ask, “why will no one hire me to work for free?”

I shared this experience with a lot of fellow students. An under-covered issue in the internship debate is just how competitive it is to secure an unpaid position in a news organization.

Newsrooms are shrinking. We know this. Getting a foot in the door is essential and harder than ever in the world of journalism. As Valerie Casselton, executive editor of the Vancouver Sun, told our class at the UBC School of Journalism, you have to have everything because, if you don’t, another candidate will and that candidate will get the position.

But having “everything” is hard when “everything” includes experience. So the one way to get experience is to fight the masses for an unpaid internship. You might not get your first choice, but that doesn’t mean you have to settle for being “the random task go-to person.”

An unpaid internship can be very fulfilling if you choose wisely. Always know exactly what you are signing up for. You can ask the company, but your best bet is to search out past interns. They won’t hesitate to give you an earful of the reality behind the job description.

You did what?

I postponed a paid internship in Cambodia to work for free this summer. Like Wang, my utopian/childhood dream internship came knocking and I just couldn’t resist. Only, in my case, it turned out better.

I grew up watching shows like Daily Planet and have always been very curious. I knew I could be happy for the rest of my life if I found a job that let me learn something new every day.

I am now one month into my internship at Discovery Channel Canada and don’t regret my decision at all. In case you are wondering, I don’t have a scholarship, student loan or a donation from generous relatives. The claim that some students can’t afford to work for free all summer is, in my opinion, debatable. I took two years off between undergrad and grad school to save money. I also have a job during school and am working right now in the hours I have outside my unpaid internship.

Discovery has taught me a lot and I am excited to go to work every day. I feel privileged to see how the magic happens behind the scenes and my experience has helped me focus my career goals.

My intention is not to create a generalized view of the unpaid internship. I’m not even sure how I feel about it from a moral or legal standpoint. I just look at my internship like a course that gives me an accurate glimpse into the industry – one that can’t be recreated in a classroom setting.

I have never enjoyed going to work as much as I do at Discovery Channel. In one month, I found my passion. And maybe that’s worth more than a paycheque.

International soccer rules force more than pros to sidelines

I recently worked on a project with two journalism colleagues (Sadiya Ansari and Suzanne Ahearne). Our multimedia story package covered the issue of hijab and soccer. Young girls across Canada are being forced from the soccer field because the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) regulations state that the hijab poses a safety risk. So far, no injuries have been reported and no medical tests can prove the hijab might injure players during games. Young men and boys who wear turbans are facing a similar dilemma: remove their turbans or sit on the sidelines. Local Canadian stories have and will continue to surface leading up to FIFA’s final vote in July on the approval of a new safety-tested hijab. This vote comes after FIFA lifted its hijab ban in March. FIFA’s hijab ban illustrates the extreme influence soccer’s international governing body has over local, amateur sport. See thethunderbird.ca for our original story. 

Canada.com published an article on May 20th that proves young men are being forced from the soccer field for wearing turbans. Aneel Samra, a 17-year-old in Montreal, was turned away during league registration for failing to agree to play without his turban.

No reports prove that the turban gives players an added advantage or threatens their wellbeing during play. But the league refunded Samra’s money regardless, according to Canada.com.

The LaSalle-based soccer league fears it could be fined for allowing players to wear turbans.

FIFA does not allow professional players to wear turbans during soccer games. And the Lac St. Louis Regional Soccer Association, the body that governs the LaSalle minor soccer association, has decided to enforce the no turban rule.

This decision comes at an interesting time as FIFA will vote on a safety-tested hijab in just over one month. It also raises an important question as to whether or not the hijab ban was ever really about safety.

If the safety-tested hijab is approved, will FIFA also have to consider allowing men to play with turbans?

Risking life to tell a story

I read an article in the Guardian about a Cambodian journalist a few weeks ago and wanted to share my reactions. I follow the Khmer Rouge Tribunal (KRT) and acquired an interest in Cambodian history after living in the country for a month in 2010.

Journalists take risks every day, but only a select few gamble their lives in the pursuit of truth. Cambodia’s Thet Sambath has wagered everything – home, family, life – in order to expose the facts behind his country’s violent past.

Between 1975 and 1979, the Khmer Rouge attempted to shape Cambodia into a utopian, agrarian society. Millions perished due to forced labour, starvation and torture.

The United Nations (UN) helped establish a tribunal intended to bring justice to the struggling country. So far, only one regime leader has been sentenced.

Memorial stands in Choeung Ek, Phnom Penh, but many Cambodians do not know the history of the Khmer Rouge and its brutal regime (here pictured in early 2010).

Planning for the tribunal began in 1998.

Snail-paced justice

The tribunal has experienced many setbacks. Judges have resigned, the Cambodian government has clashed with international officials and documents have been disputed. Such setbacks have left many wondering if justice will ever prevail.

Thet Sambath is one of those people. He has taken the pursuit of truth into his own hands. He is a senior reporter at the Phnom Penh Post and, in the last decade, has interviewed 1000 former Khmer soldiers, according to the Guardian.

He conducted these interviews in his spare time. The end goal is to expose what really happened during the Khmer Rouge years.

In an interview with the Guardian, Sambath claimed he wanted to know “why” these atrocities happened. He revealed the “how” in his prior documentary, Enemies of the People.

Truth is expensive, even in Cambodia

Sambath’s pursuit of truth has a hefty price tag. He has spent $10,000 USD, has no savings and lives in fear that the government is trying to make him disappear.

“I know too much about what really happened. They want me dead,” he told the Guardian. “Fear is always in my heart. I am worried where I am going, who is behind me, watching me, following me.”

Sambath’s fears are justified. The international community expressed anxiety over government corruption from the planning stages of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal. The UN insisted the tribunal include a mixture of Cambodian and international judges to safeguard against corruption. This mixture has been the source of many clashes and stagnation in the tribunal.

Risking it all

With no end in sight for the KRT, Sambath continues his quest for truth. But the question then becomes how far should a journalist go to get the story?

Foreign correspondents have died while covering war-torn regions. Without them, many stories would remain untold. But Sambath is not a foreign correspondent. He is a journalist reporting fearfully from his own country.

In the Guardian article, he shares stories about car chases and his constant need to move and hide from the government. Threats allegedly started after the release of his first documentary.

Sambath said he will not abandon his project, but he does plan to escape Cambodia prior to the documentary’s release.

His story begs a major question of journalistic practices and standards. How far should a journalist go to tell a story to minimize harm if it means increasing harm to him or herself?

If you want to know more about the Khmer Rouge, please also take a look at my other blog entries on thethunderbird.ca: Khmer Rouge trial proves justice too expensive for Cambodia or Khmer Rouge Tribunal sets new standard with first life sentence.

And the journey begins

It has been almost nine months since I left a full-time job in the insurance industry to start my Master of Journalism degree at UBC. I must admit, it wasn’t easy to exchange secure employment for passion and uncertainty, but I’m glad I took the risk.

Here’s why:

1. I have always been one of those curious people who asks too many questions.

2. People are inspiring and willing to share amazing stories.

3. The ability to give voice to issues that would otherwise go unheard.

4. Reading, writing and learning for a living.

5. The power to engage others in thoughtful conversation.

6. Every project brings new challenges and new learning opportunities.

7. Investigating and researching issues that people care about.

8. Good news and storytelling teaches audiences and readers something they didn’t already know.

9. No day is ever the same.

10. The chance for a career rich with passion.

Sometimes you have to test out different careers before you find the right one. That’s exactly what I did until realizing I was happiest when writing, interviewing and telling stories.

The first year of journalism school was a challenge and a huge adjustment, but I have learned so much over the past nine months and will continue to learn over the summer as I intern with Discovery Channel’s Daily Planet.

Follow my adventures here.